Name Awards

The exception that proves the rules of naming

Every week I hear from top executives and branding professionals about how a name should be simple, clear, easy to pronounce and evocative of some key value or characteristic. And then there is the international men’s fashion chain and clothing line called Ermenegildo Zegna.

Of course it is Italian. And I know it is the founder’s name. But unlike Armani and most other famous designers, he chooses not to be simply Zegna (except for the website domain). First time I saw this beautifully painted on a high class store window I stopped and stared. In that sense it worked, since it sure had my attention. But this namiac still had to write it down to make sure he could remember it by time he got back online.

Do you think this type of name takes courage or is it a stupid move? Is it simply an international language error? Or is it  a shrewd and clever move to stand out from the crowd?

How refreshing is that little “e”?

After recently writing and blogging about new name trends where vowels are squeezed out to make IM/SMS like names, it suddenly dawned on me that sometimes we go the other way. Here is a great example. Adding that little “e” to the end of the name doesn’t even change the pronunciation. But what a difference!

Suddenly the name is not generic and boring. Suddenly the name is unique and trademark protectable. And at the same time, a touch of class is added to a simple word that everyone knows – without going French with an accent.